Retraction and Correction

The journal is committed to maintaining the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of the scholarly record. When significant errors, inaccuracies, ethical concerns, or forms of publication misconduct are identified, the journal may publish a correction, expression of concern, or retraction as appropriate.

All correction and retraction decisions are handled objectively, transparently, and in accordance with established publication-ethics principles.

1. Corrections

A correction may be issued when an error in a published article affects the accuracy or clarity of the scholarly record but does not invalidate the overall findings, conclusions, or integrity of the article.

Corrections may include, but are not limited to:

  • Errors in author names or affiliations

  • Typographical or factual errors

  • Errors in tables, figures, or supplementary materials

  • Incorrect references or citation information

  • Minor errors in data presentation

  • Other errors that can be corrected without invalidating the main findings

When a correction is necessary, the journal may publish a formal correction notice linked to the original article.

The original article will generally remain available to preserve the publication record, with the correction clearly identified.

2. Retraction

A published article may be retracted when there is substantial evidence that its findings or publication process are seriously compromised.

Reasons for retraction may include:

  • Fabrication of data or research results

  • Falsification or manipulation of data

  • Plagiarism or substantial unattributed copying

  • Duplicate or redundant publication

  • Serious methodological or analytical errors that invalidate the findings

  • Major ethical violations

  • Unethical research involving human or animal participants

  • Unauthorized use of confidential or protected information

  • Serious authorship or publication misconduct

  • Significant undisclosed conflicts of interest that materially affect the article

  • Other circumstances that substantially undermine the reliability or integrity of the published work

Retraction does not necessarily imply misconduct by every author. The reasons and scope of the retraction will be stated clearly in the retraction notice.

3. Expression of Concern

The journal may publish an Expression of Concern when there are credible concerns regarding a published article but the available evidence is insufficient to make an immediate decision regarding correction or retraction.

An Expression of Concern may be issued while:

  • An investigation is ongoing

  • Additional evidence is being assessed

  • Clarification is being sought from the authors or relevant institution

  • A research institution is conducting an investigation

The Expression of Concern will remain associated with the original article until the matter has been resolved.

4. Retraction Procedure

When a potential problem with a published article is identified, the editorial team may conduct an initial assessment.

Depending on the nature of the concern, the journal may:

  1. Review the available evidence.

  2. Contact the authors for clarification.

  3. Request supporting data or documentation.

  4. Consult editors, reviewers, or independent experts.

  5. Contact the relevant institution or research organization where appropriate.

  6. Determine whether a correction, Expression of Concern, or retraction is warranted.

  7. Publish an appropriate notice explaining the decision.

Authors will generally be given an opportunity to respond to concerns before a final decision is made, except where immediate action is necessary to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.

5. Retraction Notice

A retraction notice should clearly identify:

  • The title of the retracted article

  • The authors

  • The original publication information

  • The reason or reasons for retraction

  • The date of retraction

  • The relationship between the retraction notice and the original article

The retraction notice should be freely accessible and permanently linked to the original publication.

6. Preservation of the Scholarly Record

The journal will generally maintain the original article as part of the scholarly record after retraction.

The article may be clearly marked as “Retracted” to ensure that readers are aware of its status.

The journal will avoid unnecessary removal of the original publication because maintaining the publication history supports transparency and research integrity.

7. Post-Publication Corrections

Authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other stakeholders may report potential errors or ethical concerns in published articles to the editorial office.

Reports should provide sufficient information and, where possible, supporting evidence.

The editorial team will assess credible reports and determine the appropriate course of action.

8. Author Responsibilities

Authors are expected to notify the editorial office promptly if they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work.

Authors should cooperate with the journal in:

  • Investigating reported concerns

  • Providing relevant data or documentation

  • Clarifying research procedures

  • Correcting significant errors

  • Supporting appropriate correction or retraction procedures

9. Editorial Responsibility

The editor is responsible for making appropriate decisions concerning corrections, Expressions of Concern, and retractions.

Editorial decisions should be based on evidence and should not be influenced by:

  • Personal relationships

  • Institutional affiliation

  • Commercial interests

  • Political considerations

  • Author reputation

  • Other irrelevant factors

The journal seeks to ensure that post-publication decisions are fair, transparent, and consistent.

10. Retraction Does Not Erase the Publication Record

A retraction does not normally remove the original article from the journal's archive.

The article and retraction notice should remain permanently connected so that readers, indexing services, and future researchers can accurately understand the publication history.

Where technically possible, the article's metadata should clearly indicate its retracted status.

11. Appeals

Authors may request reconsideration of a correction or retraction decision when they have substantial evidence that the decision was based on a factual error, procedural problem, or significant misunderstanding.

Appeals should be submitted to the editorial office with a clear explanation and supporting evidence.

The journal may seek independent expert advice when appropriate.

The decision following an appeal is normally final.

12. Commitment to Research Integrity

The journal is committed to correcting the scholarly record whenever necessary.

Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and retractions are not intended as punitive measures but as mechanisms for maintaining the accuracy, transparency, reliability, and integrity of academic publishing.

The journal may update this policy when necessary to reflect developments in publication ethics and recognized scholarly publishing practices.